By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: Supreme Court bail to 3 accused in 2024 Pune Porsche crash: Victim’s kin say it sends wrong message
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » Supreme Court bail to 3 accused in 2024 Pune Porsche crash: Victim’s kin say it sends wrong message

India News

Supreme Court bail to 3 accused in 2024 Pune Porsche crash: Victim’s kin say it sends wrong message

Times Desk
Last updated: February 3, 2026 4:26 am
Times Desk
Published: February 3, 2026
Share
SHARE


The Porsche car involved in the Pune car crash. File

The Porsche car involved in the Pune car crash. File
| Photo Credit: The Hindu

The family of one of the two engineers killed in the 2024 Pune Porsche accident has expressed disappointment over the Supreme Court granting bail to three accused of aiding the tampering of blood samples after the incident, saying it sends a wrong message to society.

The case relates to the incident on May 19, 2024, when a Porsche car allegedly driven by a 17-year-old boy under the influence of alcohol fatally knocked down two IT professionals — Anish Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta — in Pune’s Kalyani Nagar area.

The Supreme Court on Monday granted bail to Amar Santish Gaikwad (alleged middleman), Aditya Avinash Sood and Ashish Satish Mittal (parents of two other juveniles in the car), while observing that parents are to be blamed for such incidents involving juveniles as they don’t have control over their children.

Mr. Sood and Mr. Mittal are accused of conspiracy to replace the blood samples of their children.

Mr. Mittal is a friend of the main accused’s father, while Mr. Sood is the father of the boy who was seated on the rear seat of the car. Mr. Gaikwad is a middleman who had allegedly taken ₹3 lakh to “manipulate” the blood report.

Reacting to the Supreme Court’s decision, Anish’s family alleged that justice had not been delivered and the grant of bail sent a wrong message to society.

Anish’s grandfather, Atmaram Awadhiya, told PTI Videos that the accused should not have been granted bail. Since the main accused belonged to a wealthy family, fraudulent means were adopted from the very beginning to protect the man, he alleged.

“It was such a major incident, and now bail has been granted,” he lamented.

Anish’s father, Omprakash Awadhiya, said the three accused who were granted bail had tampered with blood samples to shield the main accused. “We want the bail to be cancelled for the sake of justice,” he said.

The Supreme Court, while granting bail to the three accused, noted that they had been in jail for 18 months.

Mr. Sood (52) and Mr. Mittal (37) were arrested on August 19 last year. Their blood samples were used for tests in connection with two minors who were in the car along with the 17-year-old main accused at the time of the accident.

The Bombay High Court on December 16 last year rejected the bail pleas of eight accused, including Mr. Gaikwad, Mr. Sood and Mr. Mittal, in the case.

The Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) had granted bail to the minor accused on lenient terms, sparking nationwide outrage. The bail conditions included writing a 300-word essay on road safety.

As bail to the accused juvenile triggered outrage, the Pune police approached the JJB to review its decision. The board then modified the order and sent the juvenile to an observation home. In June 2024, the high court ordered the release of the juvenile.

While the juvenile involved in the case was released from an observation home, 10 accused, including his parents, Vishal Agarwal and Shivani Agarwal, doctors Ajay Tawre and Shreehari Halnor, Sassoon Hospital’s staffer Atul Ghatkamble, Mr. Sood, Mr. Mittal and Arun Kumar Singh, and two middlemen, were sent to jail in the blood sample swapping case.

Published – February 03, 2026 09:56 am IST



Source link

Amid shutdown, Manipur group calls for BJP boycott
Local poll officers will visit marginalised electors to facilitate SIR hearings: WB CEO
Kerala’s extreme poverty-free declaration part of a propaganda: KPCC president
Lokesh to attend groundbreaking ceremony of Blue Jet Healthcare in Anakapalli on February 28
Yadgir ZP officials collect ₹3.12 cr. tax in one day
TAGGED:Porche crash casePune Porch caseSupreme Court BailVictim's kin disappointed
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
BrandingBusinessWorld

Gen Z, millennial spending cutbacks reshape holiday shopping season

Times Desk
Times Desk
November 28, 2025
Bengali filmmaker Anik Dutta dies: Aparajito to Bhooter Bhabishyat, a look at his famous films | Regional-cinema
Malls, e-commerce hit school accessories market hard
Jail welfare day celebrations held
T.N. CM Stalin unveils Karl Marx’s statue at Egmore Museum in Chennai
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?