By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: SC’s nine-judge Bench to decide if sovereign functions, state activities come under ‘industry’
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » SC’s nine-judge Bench to decide if sovereign functions, state activities come under ‘industry’

India News

SC’s nine-judge Bench to decide if sovereign functions, state activities come under ‘industry’

Times Desk
Last updated: February 16, 2026 6:52 am
Times Desk
Published: February 16, 2026
Share
SHARE


A general view of the Supreme Court in New Delhi The Hindu

A general view of the Supreme Court in New Delhi The Hindu
| Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap

A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court would begin hearing from March 17 a 2002 case regarding the question whether educational institutions, hospitals and sovereign functions of the government and its instrumentalities would fall within the definition of ‘industrial activity’ under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, heading a three-judge Bench on Monday (February 16, 2026), chose the case for constituting the first nine-judge Constitution during his tenure.

The question of law in the reference before the proposed nine-judge Bench concerns a 1978 judgment delivered in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa by Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer as a member of a seven-judge Bench.

The 1978 judgment had expanded the definition of ‘industry’ under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The judgment had introduced a triple test and included hospitals, educational institutions and municipalities as industries.

Significantly, the Chief Justice framed a question whether “social welfare activities and schemes or other enterprises” undertaken by government departments or its instrumentalities could be construed as industrial activity under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Another question framed by the Supreme Court for consideration by the proposed nine-judge Bench is a clarification on what ‘state/sovereign activities’ would fall within the definition of industry under Section 2(j).

Section 2(j) defines ‘industry’ to include “any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling service, employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen”.

The 1978 judgment had expanded the ambit of ‘industry’ to hold that any systematic activity, whether or not done for a profit motive, including charitable and government-run services, were an industry if they met the ‘triple test’ parameters. The judgment was designed to benefit employees to claim the status and legal protection as industrial ‘workers’. The 1978 judgment had only exempted sovereign functions from the ambit of the definition of ‘industry’.

The nine-judge Bench would be constituted on an administrative order of Chief Justice Kant. The court has fixed the hearing on two days, March 17 and March 18, 2026.

Published – February 16, 2026 12:22 pm IST



Source link

IIT Madras-Indian Railways jointly launch Omics Translational Research Lab
CJI Kant lays foundation of integrated court complexes for six Districts in Uttar Pradesh
Despite govt’s claims, Delhi’s eateries continue to struggle to get LPG cylinders
Girl gang raped in Assam’s Tinsukia while returning from school
Nine killed in boiler explosion at Chhattisgarh power plant
TAGGED:constitutional benchIndustrial Disputes Act.sovereign functionsSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
EntertainmentMovieMusic

Kareena Kapoor Khan or Karisma Kapoor, who has a bigger net worth?

Times Desk
Times Desk
September 21, 2025
16th International Theatre Festival to stage 24 productions
Centre announces Rashtriya Vigyan Puraskar for scientific achievements
Aditya Pancholi challenges rape FIR in Bombay HC, next hearing on February 24
Pregnant woman burnt to death after moving car catches fire in Kozhikode
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?