By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: SC’s nine-judge Bench to decide if sovereign functions, state activities come under ‘industry’
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » SC’s nine-judge Bench to decide if sovereign functions, state activities come under ‘industry’

India News

SC’s nine-judge Bench to decide if sovereign functions, state activities come under ‘industry’

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: February 16, 2026 6:52 am
India Times Now Desk
Published: February 16, 2026
Share
SHARE


A general view of the Supreme Court in New Delhi The Hindu

A general view of the Supreme Court in New Delhi The Hindu
| Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap

A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court would begin hearing from March 17 a 2002 case regarding the question whether educational institutions, hospitals and sovereign functions of the government and its instrumentalities would fall within the definition of ‘industrial activity’ under the Industrial Disputes Act.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, heading a three-judge Bench on Monday (February 16, 2026), chose the case for constituting the first nine-judge Constitution during his tenure.

The question of law in the reference before the proposed nine-judge Bench concerns a 1978 judgment delivered in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa by Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer as a member of a seven-judge Bench.

The 1978 judgment had expanded the definition of ‘industry’ under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The judgment had introduced a triple test and included hospitals, educational institutions and municipalities as industries.

Significantly, the Chief Justice framed a question whether “social welfare activities and schemes or other enterprises” undertaken by government departments or its instrumentalities could be construed as industrial activity under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Another question framed by the Supreme Court for consideration by the proposed nine-judge Bench is a clarification on what ‘state/sovereign activities’ would fall within the definition of industry under Section 2(j).

Section 2(j) defines ‘industry’ to include “any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling service, employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen”.

The 1978 judgment had expanded the ambit of ‘industry’ to hold that any systematic activity, whether or not done for a profit motive, including charitable and government-run services, were an industry if they met the ‘triple test’ parameters. The judgment was designed to benefit employees to claim the status and legal protection as industrial ‘workers’. The 1978 judgment had only exempted sovereign functions from the ambit of the definition of ‘industry’.

The nine-judge Bench would be constituted on an administrative order of Chief Justice Kant. The court has fixed the hearing on two days, March 17 and March 18, 2026.

Published – February 16, 2026 12:22 pm IST



Source link

Statue of Atal Bihari Vajpayee unveiled in Bhimavaram
Mysuru Sandal Soap to be relaunched today as Tamannaah’s tenure as brand ambassador begins
LPG cylinder stolen from restaurant in Kerala capital amid shortage
Apartment-style homes for urban poor: Ponguleti
Sulur sexual assault-cum-murder case: witnesses identify main accused
TAGGED:constitutional benchIndustrial Disputes Act.sovereign functionsSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

On Minister’s fiat, Dasara jumbo Gajendra shifted to Nagarahole camp

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
March 31, 2026
Supreme Court quashes FIR against former regional head of Zee Rajasthan in extortion case
Naidu pushes for technology-driven governance, names 2026 decision-making year
Injured tiger dies in the Nilgiris
Kerala’s election outcome could redefine IUML’s political path
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?