By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: Plea in Supreme Court challenges definition of caste discrimination in 2026 UGC regulations
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » Plea in Supreme Court challenges definition of caste discrimination in 2026 UGC regulations

India News

Plea in Supreme Court challenges definition of caste discrimination in 2026 UGC regulations

Times Desk
Last updated: January 27, 2026 7:23 am
Times Desk
Published: January 27, 2026
Share
SHARE


 The plea said the regulation violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 (right to equality) and 15(1), and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. File

 The plea said the regulation violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 (right to equality) and 15(1), and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. File
| Photo Credit: Sushil Kumar Verma

A plea was filed in the Supreme Court challenging a recently notified University Grants Commission (UGC) regulation, alleging that it has adopted a non-inclusionary definition of caste-based discrimination and excludes certain categories from institutional protection.

The plea submitted that regulation 3(c) of the recently notified UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 is “non-inclusionary” and fails to protect students and faculty who do not belong to reserved categories.

The plea, filed by Vineet Jindal, assailed the regulation on the grounds that caste-based discrimination is defined strictly as discrimination against members of the Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).

It is said that by limiting the scope of “caste-based discrimination” only to SC, ST, and OBC categories, the UGC has effectively denied institutional protection and grievance redressal to individuals belonging to the “general” or non-reserved categories who may also face harassment or bias based on their caste identity.

It said the provision in its present “exclusionary form” creates a hierarchy of protection that is unconstitutional. The plea said the regulation violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under articles 14 (right to equality) and 15(1) (Prohibition of discrimination by the State on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth).

It also alleged that the regulation violates Article 21 (the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to live with dignity) of the Constitution.

It urged the top court to restrain the authorities from enforcing regulation 3(c) in its current form and sought a direction to redefine caste-based discrimination in a “caste-neutral and constitutionally-compliant manner.” “Caste-based discrimination should be defined so that protection is accorded to all persons discriminated against based on caste, irrespective of their specific caste identity,” Court said.

The plea has sought interim directions to the Union Government and the UGC to ensure that the “Equal Opportunity Centres,” “Equity Helplines,” and “Ombudsperson” mechanisms established under these regulations are made available to all students in a non-discriminatory manner, pending a formal reconsideration of the definition.

Published – January 27, 2026 12:53 pm IST



Source link

Rain fury claims four lives in Rayachoti of Annamayya district in Andhra Pradesh
Munambam land not a Waqf property, says Kerala High Court
Zomato, Swiggy offer increased payout to gig workers amid strike call by unions on New Year’s Eve
Nuapada Assembly bypoll in Odisha records 14.99% voter turnout till 9 a.m.
Was VSR owner questioned by CID or extended royal hospitality: Rohit Pawar
TAGGED:Supreme Court plea challenges UGC's 2026 caste discrimination definitionugc caste guidelinesugc new guidelines
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Luxembourg ‘very important’ partner for India: Jaishankar

Times Desk
Times Desk
January 6, 2026
Cylcone Ditwah LIVE updates: Rains to intensify along Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh coast today
White House releases Joint Statement on India-U.S. interim trade deal
MGNREGS workers from Haryana stage protest at Jantar Mantar in Delhi
BJP to launch ‘Mana Ooru–Mana Jenda’ campaign across A.P. from April 6: PVN Madhav
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?