By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: New school fee law will not be implemented in the current academic year: Delhi govt tells Supeme Court
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » New school fee law will not be implemented in the current academic year: Delhi govt tells Supeme Court

India News

New school fee law will not be implemented in the current academic year: Delhi govt tells Supeme Court

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: February 2, 2026 7:21 am
India Times Now Desk
Published: February 2, 2026
Share
SHARE


Parents staging a protest over arbitrary fee hike by private schools and against DPS school Dwarka, at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi last year.

Parents staging a protest over arbitrary fee hike by private schools and against DPS school Dwarka, at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi last year.
| Photo Credit: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

The Delhi government informed the Supreme Court on Monday (February 2, 2026) that it would not implement the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Act, 2025, which seeks to regulate the fixation of fees by private schools in the national capital, from the 2025-2026 academic year.

A Bench headed by Justice P.S. Narasimha reacted to the submission made by Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, for the Director of Education, Delhi government, that “it seems better sense has prevailed finally”.

In the previous court hearing, the Bench had questioned the “rushed implementation” of the 2025 Act by the government.

“Our concern was about the rushed implementation of the Act. We would have stayed. BUt better seems to have prevailed for them (Delhi government), and they have said the law would be implemented only from the next year,” Justice Narasimha remarked.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi and Shyam Divan said the government was still insisting on applying the 2025 Act to the academic year 2025-2026 if it won the pending case in the Delhi High Court.

“The fee for the 2025-2026 academic year was fixed in March-April 2025. The Act came into existence in December 2025. How can they apply the 2025 Act retrospectively on fees fixed under the old Central law?” Mr. Rohatgi submitted.

Justice Narasimha said the point of challenge could be raised in the High Court. The Bench said the intervention of the apex court ended with the government’s submission that the Act would not be implemented from 2025-2026. The facts and law of the challenge to the law must be raised in the High Court, Justice Narsimha conveyed to the senior counsel.

Mr. Rohatgi submitted that the 2025 Act affected about a 1000 schools in the national capital and lakhs of school children. The Bench, on his request, asked the High Court to decide the petitions before it expeditiously.

The Supreme Court had earlier found the objectives of the 2025 Act beneficial, but only found fault with the knee-jerk implementation at the fag end of the current academic year.

“We are completely in favour of the legislation, but its present form of implementation is unviable…You are forcing people overnight to get up and do it. It is an ideal Act enacted for a very good purpose, but it must be implemented in a proper way,” the court had observed previously.

The new State law mandates that any increase in fees charged by private schools must be cleared through a two-tier regulatory framework comprising school-level committees and district-level appellate authorities. Under this framework, every private school is required to constitute a School Level Fee Regulation Committee (SLFRC), consisting of representatives of the school management, the principal, three teachers, five parents, and one nominee of the Directorate of Education.

Published – February 02, 2026 12:51 pm IST



Source link

News in Frames: The weight of a nation’s food
Uttam pledges to make Palamuru-Rangareddy fully operational in 30 months
Kerala Assembly Polls: Official declaration of results likely by 5 p.m. on May 4
₹1,150 crore cocaine shipment intercepted off Gujarat coast
Karnataka govt will weed out Gruha Laxmi beneficiaries who have passed away: Minister
TAGGED:delhi education fees lawdelhi education fees law supreme courtsupreme court delhi education fees law
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

APSCHE extends time till February 23 to register for certification course on quantum computing

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
February 20, 2026
HAL and Russia’s UAC join hands for production of civil jet SJ-100
Eleven migrants workers stranded in Dubai returns to Jharkhand; three wish to stay back
Nora Fatehi reacts to Sarke Chunar backlash after NCW summons: ‘No intention to offend anyone’
Pineapple farmers in Kerala feel the heat as prices plummet
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?