Image used for representational purposes only.
| Photo Credit: The Hindu
The Madras High Court has granted a final opportunity till July 13, 2026, for educationist, film producer and actor Ishari K. Ganesh to produce an order passed either by the State government or the Vigilance Commission in 2024 accepting the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC)’s decision to close a corruption case registered against him and former AIADMK Minister C. Vijayabaskar (now in TVK) in 2022.
First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan made it clear that Mr. Ganesh should produce within a week either the executive order accepting DVAC’s closure report or a judicial order quashing the 2022 First Information Report (FIR) registered against him, failing which his present plea to quash an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) shall be dismissed.
P. Sidharthan, Special Public Prosecutor for the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), brought it to the notice of the court that the DVAC had registered the FIR against Mr. Vijayabaskar, Mr. Ganesh, the Dean of Vels Medical College and Hospital in Tiruvallur district, K. Srinivasaraja and four government doctors, R. Balajinathan, T.M. Manohar, J. Sujatha and J.A. Vasanthakumar on September 12, 2022.
The FIR was booked suo motu on the basis of intelligence collected by DVAC that Mr. Ganesh of Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), a deemed to be university, had in 2020 allegedly bribed the then Health Minister Mr. Vijayabaskar to obtain ‘essentiality certificate’ for the newly constructed Vels Medical College so that it could begin admitting 150 students in MBBS course.
As per the Minimum Requirements for Annual M.B.B.S Admissions Regulations, 2020, the ‘essentiality certificate’ could be issued only if a private hospital had been in existence for a minimum of two years and was capable of being developed into a teaching hospital with a fully functional capacity of 300 beds. However, Vels Medical College was issued an ‘essentiality certificate’ even when its buildings were under construction, the FIR read.
It also accused Mr. Vijayabaskar of having induced the inspection team, comprising four doctors from the Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College Hospital, to submit a false report. “The field verification report of the Assistant Director of Town and Country Planning, Tiruvallur dated June 11, 2020 for building approval clearly proves that the buildings were under construction during the said period,” the FIR added.
However, when one of the accused Dr. Balajinathan, filed a petition in the High Court in 2025 to quash the FIR only with respect to the charges levelled against him, the DVAC filed a counter affidavit stating that it had closed the case against Mr. Vijayabaskar, Mr. Ganesh and Dr. Srinivasaraja since no incriminating evidence could be collected against the three individuals during the course of investigation.
The counter affidavit also stated that the Vigilance Commission had accepted the report submitted by the DVAC to drop action against all the accused and forwarded it to the Public Department for passing orders. Further, the Vigilance Commission itself had issued an order on June 25, 2024, dropping action against Mr. Ganesh and Dr. Srinivasaraja since they were private individuals and not public servants.
The court was also told that the DVAC had recommended only departmental action against the four government doctors for the alleged lapses committed by them during the inspection of the medical college. After recording the submissions, Justice Shamim Ahmed had on January 30, 2025 quashed all further proceedings initiated pursuant to the registration of the FIR against Dr. Balajinathan.
Relying upon that order, Mr. Ganesh had filed the present writ petition for quashing the ECIR registered against him by the ED, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act of 2002, on March 23, 2023. The ECIR had been booked based on the FIR registered by the DVAC under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Since the FIR had been closed, the ECIR should also be declared illegal, he contended.
However, when the Chief Justice’s Bench insisted upon production of either an executive order or a judicial order regarding the closure of the predicate offence, the petitioner had been seeking time periodically since March 18, 2026. Hence, the judges on Friday (July 3, 2026) granted a final opportunity and warned that his plea to quash the ECIR would be dismissed if no such order was produced by July 13, 2026.
Published – July 05, 2026 02:37 pm IST
