By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: SC stays HC order to recover ₹5 lakh from Noida DM in NSA detention case
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » SC stays HC order to recover ₹5 lakh from Noida DM in NSA detention case

India News

SC stays HC order to recover ₹5 lakh from Noida DM in NSA detention case

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: September 23, 2026 6:19 pm
India Times Now Desk
Published: September 23, 2026
Share
SHARE


A Bench headed by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma froze the operation of the Division Bench judgment, which quashed the student’s nearly five-month detention as illegal.

A Bench headed by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma froze the operation of the Division Bench judgment, which quashed the student’s nearly five-month detention as illegal.
| Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (September 23, 2026) stayed an Allahabad High Court direction to recover ₹5 lakh from the salary of Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam and other officials to compensate Delhi University student Akriti Chaudhary for detaining her under the National Security Act (NSA) over a workers’ protest in Noida in April this year.

A Bench headed by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma froze the operation of the Division Bench judgment, which quashed the student’s nearly five-month detention as illegal.

Appearing for Ms. Roopam, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi submitted that such decisions went through a multi-tiered process, including at the Central and State levels, and his client cannot be singled out for penalty. Senior Advocate Tushar Mehta, who is the Solicitor General of India, also appeared on the side of Ms. Roopam. Senior Advocate Colin Gonsalves appeared for Ms. Chaudhary, the respondent in the case.

“After hearing senior counsels for the parties, this court is of the opinion that till the matter is heard on merits, the operation of the judgment, particularly paragraphs nos. 27 to 33, shall remain stayed,” the court ordered, listing the case for October 7.

The seven paragraphs highlighted by the Supreme Court from the High Court decision against Ms. Roopam had cautioned that the continued “despotic” conduct of an errant bureaucracy could reduce Uttar Pradesh to an “Orwellian Dystopia”.

The High Court had criticised Ms. Roopam’s lack of application of mind to a police report against the student activist. It had allowed Ms. Chaudhary’s habeas corpus petition and ordered her immediate release, unless she was required in another case. The High Court had flagged discrepancies in the arrest notice and termed the State’s version a “concocted story”.

Ms. Chaudhary was among several activists arrested in connection with the protest held between April 10 and 18, during which industrial and contractual workers demanded a hike and parity with wages paid in neighbouring Haryana. The protest had turned violent on April 13.

The Uttar Pradesh Police had invoked the NSA against Ms. Chaudhary a month later, alleging that she had instigated protesters to engage in stone-pelting and arson. During a press conference, the police claimed to have “strong electronic and videographic evidence” against her.

The High Court had said the District Magistrate, by invoking the oppressive provisions of the NSA against a student activist without any previous criminal record, was setting an “example of her and deter others from exercising their right to freedom of speech and expression in public spaces in support of the labourers”.

“The District Magistrate Gautam Buddha Nagar is guilty of violating her oath of allegiance,” the High Court had observed in its decision.

Published – September 23, 2026 11:49 pm IST



Source link

MUDA case: Bengaluru special court accepts ‘B’ report filed by Lokayukta police giving clean chit to Siddaramaiah and wife Parvathi
Nellore man gets 10 years’ jail for raping 98-year-old woman as a teenager in 2017
Role of pharmacists in strengthening healthcare systems highlighted
Tamil Nadu Assembly Election 2026: Dhinakaran says DMK government has “failed on all fronts”
Over 300 participate in PU principals’ summit
TAGGED:Akriti ChaudharyNoida DM NSA detention casenoida workers protestsupreme court du student nsa
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Ammonia gas leak toll climbs to nine

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
June 23, 2026
Kerala Police launch project to transform battalions into centres of excellence
Entirely baseless: India on NATO chief’s claims that Modi asked for Ukraine plan from Putin
LPG shortage: police caution against spreading rumours
Kalaburagi tops in disposal of applications received at Atalji Janasnehi Kendras
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?