By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: SC asks Centre why disabled candidates are allocated reserved seats even when they score above cut-off marks
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » SC asks Centre why disabled candidates are allocated reserved seats even when they score above cut-off marks

SC asks Centre why disabled candidates are allocated reserved seats even when they score above cut-off marks

krutikadalvibiz
Last updated: September 12, 2025 5:56 am
krutikadalvibiz
Published: September 12, 2025
Share
SHARE


Supreme Court questions lack of upward mobility for disabled candidates despite scoring above cut-off marks.

Supreme Court questions lack of upward mobility for disabled candidates despite scoring above cut-off marks.
| Photo Credit: The Hindu Archives

A Supreme Court judgment sought a response from the Centre on why there is no “upward movement” for disabled candidates in exams/jobs even though they score over the cut-off marks for unreserved category.

The judgment by a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said disabled candidates continue to avail reservation for the disabled category instead of being included in the general category, despite scoring marks above the cut-off threshhold.

Justice Mehta, who authored the verdict, pointed out that this inevitably prevents disabled candidates who have scored lesser marks a berth in the reserved category for PwD.

Justice Mehta said such an attitude of stagnant was in violation of Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act of 2016.

Section 34, which deals with reservation, mandates that “every appropriate government shall appoint in every government establishment, not less than four per cent. of the total number of vacancies in the cadre strength in each group of posts meant to be filled with persons with benchmark disabilities”.

Published – September 12, 2025 11:17 am IST



Source link

Tamil Nadu Assembly election: CPI (M) accepts five-seat offer, signs pact with DMK
Metro Rail proposals for Coimbatore, Madurai have discrepancies: Union Minister
Minority Welfare Minister Farooq releases Class X study material for Urdu medium schools in Andhra Pradesh
UoH students’ organisations join BC JAC bandh
Jammu families hit by demolitions to ‘skip Id festivities, stay put’
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Calcutta High Court upholds decision to recognise Ritabrata Banerjee as Bengal Leader of Opposition

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
June 18, 2026
Godaan gets tax-free status in Uttar Pradesh, announces CM Yogi Adityanath
Telangana Women Safety Wing launches joint drive to curb harassment on public transport
T.N. government announces cooperative crop loan waiver up to ₹50,000
Video: Janhvi Kapoor startled as fan rushes towards Ram Charan at Peddi event | Regional-cinema
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?