By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: SC refuses to entertain plea of Delhi riots accused to attend law classes in Ghaziabad
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » SC refuses to entertain plea of Delhi riots accused to attend law classes in Ghaziabad

India News

SC refuses to entertain plea of Delhi riots accused to attend law classes in Ghaziabad

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: October 26, 2026 10:06 am
India Times Now Desk
Published: October 26, 2026
Share
SHARE


A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi refused to modify the bail conditions imposed on accused Shadab Ahmad, which bar him from leaving the national capital during the trial.

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi refused to modify the bail conditions imposed on accused Shadab Ahmad, which bar him from leaving the national capital during the trial.
| Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Monday (October 26, 2026) refused to allow an accused in the Delhi riots case, who is out on bail, to attend law classes at a university in Ghaziabad.

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi refused to modify the bail conditions imposed on accused Shadab Ahmad, which bar him from leaving the national capital during the trial.

Justice Kumar told Mr. Ahmad’s counsel: “This we will not modify… We know why you joined that law college, leaving out all the law colleges inside Delhi.”

Sensing the mood of the court, the counsel sought permission to withdraw the plea for modification of the bail condition, which the court allowed.

At the outset, the counsel submitted that Mr. Ahmad had applied for admission to the LLB course conducted by Delhi University but did not manage to get enrolled. Subsequently, he managed to get admission at a university in Ghaziabad, the counsel submitted, adding that Mr. Ahmad was on the path of “reformation.”

The Bench dismissed the plea as withdrawn, giving liberty to the accused to approach the trial court for the relief.

Mr. Ahmad had filed a miscellaneous application seeking modification of a bail condition which prohibits him from leaving the National Capital Territory without prior permission of the trial court. He also sought modification of the bail condition mandating him to mark his attendance at the Crime Branch police station of the Delhi Police twice a week, on Monday and Thursday.

On January 5, 2026, the top court refused to grant bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, while granting bail to Mr. Ahmad and four others. It had imposed 11 conditions on them and said any misuse of liberty would attract bail cancellation.

All seven accused were booked under the anti-terror Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the riots.

The February 2020 riots in northeast Delhi broke out during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), leaving 53 people dead and more than 700 injured.

The Delhi Police had arrested 18 people in the conspiracy case. Of them, several accused have got bail so far.

Published – October 26, 2026 03:33 pm IST



Source link

Cycling a solution to pollution, says Union Minister Mandaviya after BRICS Friendship Cycling event
Kerala polls: K.C. Venugopal says UDF to move ECI against Rajeev Chandrasekhar over ‘concealed assets’
Government proposes to send VBSA Bill to JPC
LDF questions lack of criticism of Centre in policy address
PE-VC firms invested $3,513 million across 61 deals in Tamil Nadu-based companies in 2025
TAGGED:Delhi riots case Supreme CourtSC Delhi riots accused law classesShadab Ahmad bail conditionUAPA Delhi riots conspiracy caseUmar Khalid Sharjeel Imam bail
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Health Minister inaugurates 10 new AMRIT outlets across India

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
November 15, 2025
Jana Nayagan completes first weekend in theatres; how much did Vijay’s film earn at the box office on Day 4?
50 OTT platforms disabled over the last two years | Explained
Beware of people dividing society on the basis of caste, religion: CM
Bandhan Bank Share Price: Stock falls nearly 6% as Q2 profit slides to Rs 112 crore – Details
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?