Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar. File
Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar on Saturday (December 13, 2025) said officials responsible for registering documents should have refused to process agreements that were not permissible under the law and clearly informed the parties concerned about such limitations.
His comments came against the backdrop of a notice issued by the deputy registrar to the firm of his son, Parth Pawar, seeking ₹21 crore in stamp duty and penalties in connection with a controversial land deal in Pune.
Recently, the Bombay High Court raised sharp questions regarding the police probe into the land deal, suggesting authorities might be shielding Parth Pawar by failing to name him in the FIR.
Parth Pawar land row: Congress leader seeks HC-monitored probe
Ajit Pawar sought to dispel perceptions stemming from a Bill cleared by the Legislative Assembly on Friday (December 12, 2025), which empowers the Revenue Minister to hold hearings in contentious cases related to the IGR.
Mr. Pawar said those who registered such documents were at fault, and officials should have exercised due diligence at the time of registration.
“The officials who received the documents for registration of a deal should have refused to register it. They should have clearly informed the parties that such an agreement cannot be processed,” said the Deputy Chief Minister.
₹300-crore land deal row linked to Ajit Pawar’s son: probe ordered, two officials suspended
When asked about allegations that the Bill was moved to protect Mr. Parth, who holds a 99% equity stake in Amadea Enterprises LLP, Aijt Pawar reiterated that responsibility lay with the registering authorities.
“We are elected representatives in the House, and people have voted for us. We are free to take decisions or make amendments we find suitable,” he said when asked about the intent behind the amendment.
Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule has said that under the earlier provision, complainants dissatisfied with decisions at the level of the IGR had to approach the High Court. After the amendment, such complainants can now approach the Revenue Minister, who will be authorised to hold hearings in these matters.
He also stated that certain transactions have caused financial losses to the state exchequer, necessitating a more effective redressal mechanism.
The sale of 40 acres of land in Pune’s upscale Mundhwa area for ₹300 crore to Amadea Enterprises LLP, in which Parth Pawar is a majority partner, came under scrutiny after it emerged that the plot belongs to the government and it could not be sold. The firm was also allegedly exempted from paying ₹21 crore in stamp duty.
A committee headed by the Joint Inspector General of Registration (IGR) had indicted Digvijay Patil (Parth Pawar’s business partner and cousin), Sheetal Tejwani (who held the power of attorney on behalf of the land sellers), and sub-registrar Ravindra Taru. They were named in an FIR registered at a police station in Pune. “Parth Pawar was not named as his name didn’t appear on any document,” a senior official had said.
Published – December 13, 2025 10:51 am IST
