By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: How a horoscope notebook and PIN Code exposed a Tamil Nadu judge’s false claim at Supreme Court
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » How a horoscope notebook and PIN Code exposed a Tamil Nadu judge’s false claim at Supreme Court

India News

How a horoscope notebook and PIN Code exposed a Tamil Nadu judge’s false claim at Supreme Court

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: August 19, 2026 1:47 am
India Times Now Desk
Published: August 19, 2026
Share
SHARE


The Registrar General of the Madras High Court moved the Supreme Court challenging the judicial decision favouring Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate M. Manickam.

The Registrar General of the Madras High Court moved the Supreme Court challenging the judicial decision favouring Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate M. Manickam.
| Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

For those who believe in astrology, a horoscope is a guide to the future. But sometimes, the same horoscope can expose a lie—and derail someone’s ambition to remain in service for a few more years. This is one such case.

In November 1988, M. Manickam joined the Tamil Nadu State Subordinate Judicial Services as Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate. In October 1993, he submitted a representation to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanniyakumari, seeking to change his date of birth. Manickam said while his SSLC record showed his date of birth as March 19, 1947, he was actually born on November 24, 1950. If his contention is accepted, his service period would be extended by nearly four years.

Published – August 19, 2026 06:00 am IST



Source link

When violence broke out after Vanniyar Sangam’s Chitra Pournami festival, Jayalalithaa blamed Madras High Court for permitting rallies
Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant data leak: What happened and what we know | Explained
BJP hits out at Opposition over its stand on SIR 2.0
Third synchronised survey of Nilgiri tahr from April 24 to 27
Cyberabad police go door-to-door as tens of thousands of challans remain unpaid
TAGGED:date of birth alterationM Manickam judge date of birth caseManickam vs State of Tamil Nadu judgmenttamil nadu infocus
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
EntertainmentMovieMusic

Kiara Advani says she’s become ‘more of a tigress’ after Saraayah’s birth: ‘Nothing else matters…’

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
March 28, 2026
Here’s why Reddit users think Arijit Singh’s retirement is more of a ‘rebellion’ than just stepping away
Kerala’s UDF government announces 100-day action plan from June 1
Wild elephant attack claims 65-year-old man in Kerala’s Wayanad
Man with pregnant wife sits on road in protest against Governor’s convoy in Bengaluru
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?