By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: HC imposes ₹10,000 fine on former Palakkad RDO
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » HC imposes ₹10,000 fine on former Palakkad RDO

India News

HC imposes ₹10,000 fine on former Palakkad RDO

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: November 12, 2025 8:15 pm
India Times Now Desk
Published: November 12, 2025
Share
SHARE


The Kerala High Court has imposed a fine of ₹10,000 on a former Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) of Palakkad for allegedly making a land owner re-approach the court a second time for reclassification of his land that had been recorded in Revenue records as nilam (paddy land).

In his petition, the landowner, C. Vinumon of Kannadi, Palakkad, challenged the RDO’s order dismissing his application to change the nature of his property in the records, without passing a speaking order. This was allegedly done despite the High Court directing him to reconsider the matter. He contended that the property had already been converted in 2008 and mentioned in the records as fallow land, before the enactment of the relevant law.

The former RDO contended that he had signed the order that was prepared by a junior superintendent in his office since he was busy with post-election duties.

Stating that authorised officers are not laymen, and that they are senior officers of the State service, the court said that the present case was an apt example of an authorised officer issuing a stereotype order even after the court set aside the same and directed its reconsideration. The same order was repeated without any change, including the modulation of the sentences, it added.

Published – November 13, 2025 01:45 am IST



Source link

QR code tags help trace missing children, senior citizens at Kanaka Durga temple
What are the safety overhauls M. Chinnaswamy Stadium has undergone? | Decode Karnataka
25 schools in Ahmedabad and Vadodara receive bomb threat emails; searches underway
All roads lead to Aspinwall House
Satyabrata Sahoo posted as Commissioner of Economics and Statistics
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Sébastien Lecornu | Macron’s lieutenant

krutikadalvibiz
krutikadalvibiz
September 13, 2025
Beyond paper leaks, the question of trust and institutional integrity
Telangana CM seeks Union Cabinet nod for starting RRR northern section works
Special trains between Kolhapur and Kalaburagi during festival season
Ticket seekers crowd party offices in Patna on day of ECI’s announcement for Bihar election
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?