By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: Madras High Court dismisses AIADMK whip’s case against amendment to Mekedatu resolution passed by Tamil Nadu Assembly
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » Madras High Court dismisses AIADMK whip’s case against amendment to Mekedatu resolution passed by Tamil Nadu Assembly

India News

Madras High Court dismisses AIADMK whip’s case against amendment to Mekedatu resolution passed by Tamil Nadu Assembly

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: September 23, 2026 5:54 am
India Times Now Desk
Published: September 23, 2026
Share
SHARE


Contents
  • AIADMK whip’s plaint
  • A-G plays video clips of proceedings
Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay moved a resolution in the Assembly against the Karnataka government’s proposal to construct a balancing reservoir across the Cauvery at Mekedatu, on June 19, 2026

Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay moved a resolution in the Assembly against the Karnataka government’s proposal to construct a balancing reservoir across the Cauvery at Mekedatu, on June 19, 2026
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

The Madras High Court on Wednesday (September 23, 2026) dismissed a writ petition filed by All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) whip Agri S.S. Krishnamurthy, who had challenged an amendment to a resolution passed by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly on June 19, 2026, against the proposed construction of Mekedatu dam across the Cauvery river by the Karnataka government.

The First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan rejected the case after Advocate General (A-G) Vijay Narayan played video clips of the Assembly proceedings to prove that it was, in fact, the amended resolution that was put to vote in the House by Speaker J.C.D. Prabhakar and passed uananimously, after no Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) raised any objections.

AIADMK whip’s plaint

The AIADMK whip had approached the court complaining that the amendment, which urges the Centre to constitute a tribunal for resolving the inter-State dispute regarding Mekedatu dam, was not debated at all in the House and that it was introduced at the last moment after almost all the members of the House had expressed their unanimous support to the unamended resolution circulated to them a day before the proceedings.

He said that Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay had agreed to carry out the amendment at the request of the Leader of the Opposition Udhayanidhi Stalin and such amendment ought to have been debated before being passed as an unanimous decision taken by the House. Since the amended resolution had been communicated to the Centre as well, the petitioner insisted upon withdrawing the same.

He had also urged the court to quash the portion of the resolution, which demands the constitution of a tribunal under Section 4 of the Inter State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, and declare that the unamended resolution, expressing strong opposition to the construction of the proposed dam by the neighbouring State, as having been validly adopted by the Legislative Assembly on June 19, 2026.

A-G plays video clips of proceedings

On the other hand, the A-G played video clips of the request made by the Leader of the Opposition to carry out the amendment, its acceptance by the Chief Minister, and the amended resolution having been put to vote by the Speaker. He told the court it was only the amended resolution that was put to vote and none of the members, including the writ petitioner, raised any objection at that point of time.

Published – September 23, 2026 11:24 am IST



Source link

Opposition uproar in Chhattisgarh Assembly over LPG cylinder shortage
Madras HC directs CMRL to conduct surprise checks in Metro trains to ensure priority seating for senior citizens, PwDs
SC to examine impact of DPDP law on RTI, investigative journalism
200 units of free power, women safety force and anti-narcotics unit: Vijay’s top three priorities on Day 1 in office
Kochi Chander Kunj apartment owners file contempt plea against Army Welfare Housing Organisation over rent default
TAGGED:AIADMKmadras high courtMekedatu issuemekedatu resolution casetamil nadu assembly
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Uttar Pradesh ATS arrests dental student for links with ISIS online module

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
March 17, 2026
18 of 33 Telangana districts record temperatures above 41°C amid rising heatwave conditions
Cyberabad Municipal Corporation Commissioner takes charge
Media bodies condemn ‘exclusion’ of women journalists in Afghan Minister’s press conference
Oppressive weather adds to the election heat this season
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?