By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: CPI(M) in Kerala alleges IAS officer’s removal as Vizhinjam MD was to benefit Adani
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » CPI(M) in Kerala alleges IAS officer’s removal as Vizhinjam MD was to benefit Adani

India News

CPI(M) in Kerala alleges IAS officer’s removal as Vizhinjam MD was to benefit Adani

Times Desk
Last updated: July 4, 2026 6:13 am
Times Desk
Published: July 4, 2026
Share
SHARE


Divya S. Iyer

Divya S. Iyer
| Photo Credit: H.VIBHU

Thiruvananthapuram

The Opposition CPI(M) in Kerala on Saturday alleged that the recent removal of IAS officer Divya S Iyer as the Managing Director of Vizhinjam International Seaport was aimed at benefiting the Adani Group, and demanded that Chief Minister V D Satheesan explain the reasons behind her transfer.

Senior CPI(M) leader and Kannur district secretary K K Ragesh made the allegation in a Facebook post amid the ongoing controversy over Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd’s (APSEZ) proposed transfer of a 49 per cent stake in Adani Vizhinjam Port Private Limited (AVPPL), the port concessionaire, to Switzerland-based shipping giant Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC).

Mr. Ragesh alleged that Iyer had played a key role in safeguarding the state’s interests by resisting attempts to alter provisions of the Vizhinjam port concession agreement and claimed that Adani authorities had made repeated efforts to have her removed from the post.

He further alleged that the then Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan had rejected such attempts, telling the company that the government would decide matters relating to its officials.

According to Mr. Ragesh, the woman bureaucrat was transferred soon after the change of government and replaced by an officer with no experience in port administration.

Ms. Iyer is now serving as the principal director of the Local Self Government (LSGD) Department.

Mr. Ragesh asked the Chief Minister to clarify why an experienced officer heading a strategically important project was shifted immediately after the new government assumed office.

Mr. Ragesh also questioned Satheesan’s recent chartered flight visit to Mangaluru, alleging that “the results” of that meeting with Adani officials were beginning to emerge. He sought an explanation on the purpose of the visit and who bore the cost of the chartered flight.

The CPI(M) leader criticised the government’s decision to retain the ports portfolio along with the finance department under the Chief Minister.

He alleged that the empowered committee constituted to examine the proposed share transfer comprised officials from departments directly under the Chief Minister, raising concerns over its independence.

Noting that the concession agreement requires prior approval from the state government for any share transfer, Mr. Ragesh asked whether the government was prepared to initiate legal action against the proposed stake sale.

He also alleged that while the state had invested around ₹5,400 crore in the Vizhinjam project, Adani had invested about ₹2,400 crore and stood to gain over ₹13,000 crore through the proposed transaction.

The remarks come days after Chief Minister Satheesan expressed the state government’s displeasure over APSEZ announcing the proposed transfer of a 49 per cent stake in AVPPL to MSC without informing the government.

The Chief Minister had said the state government had not granted approval for the transaction and that the matter would be examined by an empowered committee in accordance with the concession agreement.

Published – July 04, 2026 11:43 am IST



Source link

Supreme Court upholds High Court order quashing cash-for-vote case against ex-TDP member
Mumbai BMC Opposition demands independent inquiry in ₹248 crore Mrinaltai Gore flyover project
Andhra Pradesh recognised as an ‘Achiever’ in SEEI-2024 
PM orders accountability over NCERT judiciary ‘corruption’ content; Education Minister vows action
PIL in Delhi HC seeks to increase payout to Indigo passengers
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

India’s higher education enrolment hits 4.5 crore; women, marginalised groups lead way: AISHE report

Times Desk
Times Desk
July 8, 2026
Ramadoss grapples a with lack of choices as Anbumani joins AIADMK alliance
From rage-cleaning to silence retreats: 5 new-age stress cures Indians are loving
Retaining IT professionals in Telangana’s Tier-II and III cities a challenge with youth favouring Hyderabad after training: Minister
JD (S) will contest local bodies elections independently, says HDD
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?