By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking ₹1 crore as fee and expenses for filing cases to ‘save’ former CJI
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking ₹1 crore as fee and expenses for filing cases to ‘save’ former CJI

India News

Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking ₹1 crore as fee and expenses for filing cases to ‘save’ former CJI

Times Desk
Last updated: March 12, 2026 11:21 am
Times Desk
Published: March 12, 2026
Share
SHARE


Supreme Court of India. File

Supreme Court of India. File
| Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (March 12, 2026) dismissed a plea filed by an advocate who sought a direction to the Centre to pay him ₹1 crore as fee and expenses for filing six cases in 2018 to allegedly “save” then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra.

A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi said the petition was “totally misconceived”.

Emotional CJI Dipak Misra holds court for last time

The top court was hearing the petition filed by Lucknow-based advocate Ashok Pandey challenging an order of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court in March last year.

The High Court had dismissed his plea seeking a direction to the Centre to pay ₹1 crore as fee and expenses for six cases which he had filed.

Mr. Pandey told the apex court that he had filed six cases to “defend” then CJI Misra.

The petitioner said he had incurred expenses of ₹2 lakh for litigation in those cases and he took money from his daughter for it.

“After making left and right all kinds of allegations against judges, why are you using the word honourable now,” the CJI asked.

The petitioner referred to the January 2018 press conference by the then four senior-most judges of the apex court.

“Judges can’t address a press conference against the chief justice and this was against the norms,” he said.

The CJI observed, “You provided social service to the institution. Social service is always priceless. How can it be assessed at ₹1 crore or two crore?” The Bench told the petitioner that he had done social service and if he wanted an appreciation, “we appreciate you for that”.

It dismissed the plea challenging the High Court order.

Before the High Court, the petitioner had also challenged a July 2024 order passed by the Ministry for Law and Justice through which his claim for payment of ₹1 crore as fee and expenses for filing six cases to allegedly save the then CJI was rejected.

Published – March 12, 2026 04:51 pm IST



Source link

Student found dead in school building
Kannur airport on threshold of transformation as land acquisition and road upgrades gain pace
A young IAS officer’s reform wish list for new government
73 IndiGo flights cancelled at Bengaluru airport on December 4
Telangana government initiates action plan to combat mosquito menace in Hyderabad
TAGGED:Dipak Misrasave CJI Dipak Misrasave' former CJISupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Hyderabad floods: Parsigutta families escaped death by a whisker

krutikadalvibiz
krutikadalvibiz
September 15, 2025
Kerala Assembly Elections 2026: Calicut varsity contract staff suspended for poll code violation
Madhya Pradesh Economic Survey projects State’s GDP at 11.14%
Telangana Medical Council not competent to act against Ayurvedic doctors practising allopathic medicine: HC
New office-bearers elected for Madras Bar Association
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?