By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
India Times NowIndia Times NowIndia Times Now
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Reading: Ram Temple donations theft case: SIT report finds 105 instances of unauthorised currency removal
Share
India Times NowIndia Times Now
Font ResizerAa
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
Search
  • Bharat Shreshtha Ratna Sanman
  • India News
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • The Escapist
    • Insider
    • Finance ₹
    • India News
    • Science
    • Health
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Home » Ram Temple donations theft case: SIT report finds 105 instances of unauthorised currency removal

India News

Ram Temple donations theft case: SIT report finds 105 instances of unauthorised currency removal

India Times Now Desk
Last updated: September 21, 2026 5:04 pm
India Times Now Desk
Published: September 21, 2026
Share
SHARE


Reading out from the status report, the Bench said the SIT investigation had banked extensively on CCTV footage to identify the accused persons, followed by recoveries, forensic examinations, and audits. File

Reading out from the status report, the Bench said the SIT investigation had banked extensively on CCTV footage to identify the accused persons, followed by recoveries, forensic examinations, and audits. File
| Photo Credit: PTI

A Supreme Court Bench led by the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Monday (September 21, 2026) said that a status report submitted by the Uttar Pradesh government’s Special Investigation Team (SIT) had identified 105 instances of unauthorised currency removal captured on CCTV in the Ram Temple donations misappropriation case.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, said the probe had been “substantially concluded” and a chargesheet in the case would be filed before the court of the jurisdictional Additional Sessions Judge on or before September 25, 2026. The court noted from the report that the role of every person allegedly involved had been assessed.

The 90-day statutory period for investigation, which started with the first arrest in the case, would draw to an end on September 25, after which the accused persons were entitled to default bail, Mr. Mehta pointed out.

The status report was perused by the Bench in court. However, the audio was muted and the screen went blank when the order was read out, requiring media personnel to enter the courtroom to grab shreds of the court’s oral dictation of the order.

When senior advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, appearing for petitioner Ajay Kumar Rai, sought a copy of the status report, the Bench said the contents of the documents had been summarised and covered in the judicial order itself.

“The State requires to be transparent,” Mr. Jandhyala said.

Reading out from the status report, the Bench said the SIT investigation had banked extensively on CCTV footage to identify the accused persons, followed by recoveries, forensic examinations, and audits.

After noting that the primary offences included criminal breach of trust, and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the court said the prospect of further investigation to continue under Section 193 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, would remain open.

Noting that although it did not want to intervene in the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court, the Bench asked the State government to file a copy of the chargesheet in the apex court, too.

The three-member SIT, headed by Lucknow Divisional Commissioner Vijay Vishwas Pant, was constituted by the State government on June 13 at the request of the Trust, before the Supreme Court intervened in the matter. Range Inspector General Kiran S. and Special Secretary (Finance) Neel Ratan Kumar are the other members of the SIT.

The First Information Report named eight people — Avinash Shukla, Anukalp Mishra, Lavkush Mishra, Manish Kumar Yadav, Karunesh Pandey, Ramashankar Mishra, Subhash Srivastava, and Ram Shankar Yadav alias Tinnu — and other unidentified individuals as accused.

Published – September 21, 2026 05:39 pm IST



Source link

Tamil Nadu is committed to working constructively with Centre, says Vijay
Lawrence Bishnoi gang stakes claim on gunfire outside Diljit Dosanjh’s manager in Karnal
Kannada writer S.L. Bhyrappa cremated with State honours in Mysuru
Bihar Assembly polls: INDIA bloc to be wiped out as Rahul Gandhi insulted Chhathi Maiyya, says Amit Shah
‘Architects of 9/11 were not hiding in caves,’ India tells UNSC in scathing attack at Pakistan
TAGGED:chargesheet on ram temple donation theftRam temple donation theft case
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe
TelegramFollow

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
[mc4wp_form]
Popular News

Plans afoot for renovation of Telangana State Archaeology Museum; Egyptian mummy conservation to cost ₹82 lakh

India Times Now Desk
India Times Now Desk
August 19, 2026
Congress manages to find balance in appointment of district unit presidents
New feat for Dhurandhar: Within 24 hours of OTT release Ranveer Singh’s film takes No 1 spot on Netflix India
Watch | Ajit Pawar dies in Baramati plane crash; a look at his life in Maharashtra politics
Is Hardik Pandya engaged? Girlfriend Mahieka Sharma’s ring in latest post sparks engagement rumours
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Global Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed

0

Death

0

More Information:Covid-19 Statistics
© INDIA TIMES NOW 2026 . All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?